← All comparisons
Comparison
GetCited vs Gushwork.ai
Gushwork.ai is a dfy service + tool hybrid ($800 / $1,200 / $2,200 per month). Here's how it compares to GetCited's full-stack AEO platform.
Gushwork.ai Strengths
+$9M seed (SIG + Lightspeed, Feb 2026) — $11M total raised, $33M post
+300+ paying customers · ~$9K ACV · 50–80% MoM growth reported
+14+ named logos including The Good Bug, Weekday (15x traffic), Spark (978% downloads), Dashtoon (10K+ organic/mo), Activated Scale, Tratta, n90
+Partner backlink network across 200–300 sites — 10–40 editorial links/mo (2.5-year moat)
+AI Feed primitive — a structured content feed hosted at feeds.brand.com designed for LLM ingestion
+llms.txt auto-updater (not just generator)
+White-glove onboarding with dedicated CSM
+TechCrunch coverage + founder brand
Gushwork.ai Gaps vs GetCited
−Thinner detection stack — tracks 4 AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude) vs GetCited's 10
−No three-pillar audit · no Citation Health Score · no Wilson-CI Impact Measurement · no Wikipedia/Wikidata checks · no Corpus Signals
−No self-serve tier — $800/mo floor excludes founders and SMBs
−Hidden behind CSM — no transparent Priority Focus Inbox, no Impact Verdict Strip
−No methodology IP or playbook you can own — you rent the service
−No Shopify AEO module · no MCP server · no INR/Razorpay pricing for Indian brands
−No free tools · no free tier
The Difference?
Gushwork.ai shows you where you stand. GetCited shows you where you stand and generates the fix. Monitor 10 AI engines, access 34 GSC intelligence modules, and deploy schemas with our WordPress plugin.