All Comparisons
SEO Suite

GetCited vs Ahrefs

The $100M-ARR SEO giant that bolted on Brand Radar — massive prompt data, but AEO is a side dish on a very full plate.

Pricing: $129 Lite + $699 Brand Radar add-on (~$828/mo all-in)Type: SEO Suite + AEO Add-onFunding: Bootstrapped. ~$100M ARR. Profitable.
In 30 Seconds

Ahrefs is the SEO industry standard for a reason, and Brand Radar brings genuine scale to AI visibility monitoring. But scale without action is expensive observation. If you need the full AEO loop — monitor, diagnose, fix, measure — GetCited delivers that at a fraction of the cost. If you already pay for Ahrefs and just need a visibility overlay, Brand Radar is a natural add-on.

Understanding Ahrefs

Ahrefs needs no introduction. With a 395-million-prompt dataset and the largest backlink index on the planet, they are the default SEO toolkit for agencies and in-house teams worldwide. Brand Radar, their AEO add-on, leverages that scale to track brand mentions across 6 AI platforms: Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity.

The raw data firepower is undeniable. Ahrefs can tell you which prompts mention your brand, which cited domains compete for your topics, and how your visibility shifts over time. The credit system (~2,500/mo on the all-in bundle) gives you meaningful query volume. And because it plugs into the existing Ahrefs workflow — Site Explorer, Content Explorer, Rank Tracker — the learning curve is almost zero for existing customers.

The gap is architectural. Brand Radar tracks 6 platforms but notably excludes Claude, DeepSeek, and Meta AI — three engines that increasingly drive enterprise and developer-adjacent discovery. There is no fix generation layer, no schema tools, no content pipeline, and no editorial placement. You get excellent observation with zero remediation. At ~$828/mo for the combined bundle, you are paying enterprise pricing for monitoring alone — and you still need a separate tool or team to act on the findings.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

CapabilityGetCitedAhrefs
AI Visibility Monitoring10 engines + free tier6 platforms
Copy-Paste Fix Generators
Schema/JSON-LD Generators
Content CreationHuman-written editorial
Editorial Placement
AEO Scanner (no-auth)
Citation Building
Technical AI Readiness Audit
E-E-A-T Optimization
Free Tools4 free tools, no loginWebmaster Tools (limited)
Agency Services
WordPress PluginWordPress SEO plugin
GBP Review Management
GSC Intelligence34 modules
Competitor IntelligenceCited domains
Impact MeasurementWilson CI verdicts
MCP Server
Shopify AEO Module

When to Choose What

Choose Ahrefsif…
You are already an Ahrefs power-user and want AEO data in the same interface
You need the largest prompt dataset for market-level visibility research
Cited-domain intelligence matters more than fix generation for your workflow
Your team has in-house execution capacity and just needs monitoring data
Choose GetCited if…
You need action — fix generators, schema tools, content creation, editorial placement
You want 10 engines including Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI
You need a platform starting at $99/mo, not $828/mo for monitoring alone
You want statistical validity (Wilson CI verdicts) built into every measurement

Ahrefs: Strengths & Gaps

Strengths
+395M-prompt dataset — largest in the space
+6 AI platforms (AIO, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity)
+Seamless integration with Ahrefs' existing SEO toolkit
+Cited-domain intelligence shows which sources AI engines trust
+Credit system offers meaningful query volume (~2,500/mo)
+Established brand trusted by 100K+ organizations
Gaps vs GetCited
No Claude, DeepSeek, or Meta AI coverage
No fix generation, schema tools, or content pipeline
No editorial placement or citation building
~$828/mo all-in makes it one of the priciest monitoring-only options
AEO is an add-on, not the core product focus
Grok tracking paused

The Verdict

Ahrefs is the SEO industry standard for a reason, and Brand Radar brings genuine scale to AI visibility monitoring. But scale without action is expensive observation. If you need the full AEO loop — monitor, diagnose, fix, measure — GetCited delivers that at a fraction of the cost. If you already pay for Ahrefs and just need a visibility overlay, Brand Radar is a natural add-on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Ahrefs Brand Radar track Claude and DeepSeek?+
No. As of July 2026, Ahrefs Brand Radar covers 6 platforms: Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity. Claude, DeepSeek, Meta AI, and Grok are not tracked. GetCited monitors 10 engines including Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI.
How much does Ahrefs cost for AEO monitoring?+
Brand Radar is a $699/mo add-on that requires at least the $129/mo Lite plan, totaling ~$828/mo. GetCited starts at $99/mo for monitoring across 10 AI engines plus fix generators and content tools.
Can Ahrefs fix AEO issues it finds?+
No. Ahrefs Brand Radar is monitoring-only. It identifies visibility gaps but provides no fix generators, schema tools, content creation, or editorial placement. GetCited includes all of these in its platform.
Is Ahrefs or GetCited better for AEO?+
Ahrefs is better if you need market-level prompt data at scale and already use their SEO toolkit. GetCited is better if you need the full AEO workflow — monitoring plus action. Most teams that care about AI visibility will eventually need both observation and execution.

Ready to see the difference?

Run a free AEO audit on your brand in under 60 seconds. No login required.

Try the AEO Scanner Free →View Pricing
More Comparisons
vs Otterly.AIvs Profoundvs Peec AIvs AthenaHQvs Writesonicvs HubSpot AEO Gradervs Gushwork.aivs SEOTestingvs GenOptimavs AEO Enginevs Conductorvs SE Rankingvs TrySightvs Surfer SEOvs Flyrankvs Semrushvs Scrunch AIvs Evertunevs Quattrvs Frasevs Goodie AI