Comparison
GetCited vs Conductor
Conductor is a enterprise saas (Enterprise custom ($38K–$200K+/year)). Here's how it compares to GetCited's full-stack AEO platform.
Feature
GetCited
Conductor
AI Visibility Monitoring
10 engines + free tier
All major engines
Copy-Paste Fix Generators
✓
✗
Schema/JSON-LD Generators
✓
✗
Content Creation
Human-written editorial
AI-powered at scale
Editorial Placement
✓
✗
AEO Scanner (no-auth)
✓
✗
Citation Building
✓
✗
Technical AI Readiness Audit
✓
24/7 site monitoring
E-E-A-T Optimization
✓
✗
Free Tools
4 free tools, no login
✗
Agency Services
✓
✗
WordPress Plugin
✓
✗
GBP Review Management
✓
✗
GSC Intelligence
34 modules
Enterprise analytics
Conductor Strengths
- + Only end-to-end enterprise AEO platform
- + 50+ enterprise logos (Airbnb, Coca-Cola, Atlassian)
- + Forrester Wave Leader
- + MCP integration with ChatGPT/Claude
- + ISO 42001 + SOC 2 Type 2 certified
- + ROI-connected reporting via GA4/Adobe
Conductor Gaps vs GetCited
- - Enterprise-only — no SMB or mid-market tier
- - Pricing excludes 99% of the market ($38K+ annually)
- - Complex setup with steep learning curve
- - Weekly rank tracking cadence only
- - No free tools or self-serve option
- - No WordPress plugin
The Difference?
Conductor shows you where you stand. GetCited shows you where you stand and generates the fix. Monitor 10 AI engines, manage GBP reviews with AI-powered replies, access 34 GSC intelligence modules, and deploy schemas with our WordPress plugin. Plus, our agency tier delivers human-written editorial content placed on real publications — not AI-generated slop.