Live · 10 AI engines · 405 audit checks

Your buyers are asking AI
who to trust.
Is your brand the answer?

GetCited tracks whether AI engines recommend your brand, fixes what's holding you back, and delivers proof your board can read.

FreeNo account needed60 seconds

GM
AK
SR
PV

Join 400+ brands that know whether AI recommends them

AEO Readiness Radar
7-pillar score · your brand
LIVE
EntityTechnicalOn-siteSchemaE-E-A-TOff-siteLinked
72/100
AEO Readiness · Grade B

Sample data — this is the shape of the output, not a client result

ChatGPT · OpenAIPerplexity AIGemini · GoogleClaude · AnthropicCopilot · MicrosoftAI Overview · GoogleDeepSeekMeta AIGrok · xAIGoogle AI ModeChatGPT · OpenAIPerplexity AIGemini · GoogleClaude · AnthropicCopilot · MicrosoftAI Overview · GoogleDeepSeekMeta AIGrok · xAIGoogle AI Mode

24 integrations · works with your existing stack

WordPress
Webflow
Framer
Shopify
Search Console
Analytics 4
Semrush
GitHub
Cloudflare
Netlify
HubSpot
Trustpilot
Claude MCP
+ 11 more
The Shift

Your buyers changed how they
research. Did your marketing?

Buyers now ask AI for recommendations before they ask Google, before they talk to sales, before they visit your website.

Then
Rank on page 1, buyers click through
Measure success in traffic and rankings
Competitors visible in the same SERP
CTR was the conversion signal
Now
Buyers ask ChatGPT for a recommendation
AI picks one brand — often the same one, repeatedly
Your competitor could be winning — invisibly
Citation rate is the metric that matters
0%
of searches end inside the AI answer
Your buyer got their recommendation from AI. They never clicked through to any website — including yours.
SparkToro / SimilarWeb 2025
↓0%
drop in CTR on your highest-intent queries
The queries closest to purchase. The consideration layer that used to drive your pipeline. AI Overview is now answering them first.
Advanced Web Ranking 2025
0
AI engines all decide independently who to recommend
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, DeepSeek, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overview, AI Mode. Most brands are tracked in zero of them.
GetCited monitors all 10
How It Works

Track it. Fix it.
Prove it worked.

Most tools tell you what's wrong and stop there. We fix it, then deliver statistical proof that the fix moved the needle.

01

See exactly where you stand

A full diagnostic of your brand's AI presence — technical, content, authority, and off-site. Every gap scored and ranked before we touch a single thing.

→AI crawl accessibility check
→Schema validation across all pages
→Citation share vs competitors
02

Know exactly what to fix, and in what order

Every fix is ranked by expected citation lift and effort. The highest-impact changes go first. Schema deployed. Content briefs written. Published to your CMS directly.

→Lift ranked fix queue
→Schema auto-generated and deployed
→Publishes to WordPress, Webflow, Framer
03

Show your board exactly what changed

Every change gets a statistically verified verdict. Significant lift, regression, or no detectable change — per engine, per query. A clear report your leadership can read.

→Before/after citation rate per engine
→Statistical significance verified (Wilson 95% CI)
→Weekly digest report for stakeholders

Your competitor may already know their AI citation rate. Do you?

Free audit. No account. Drop your domain and see your brand's AI presence in 60 seconds.

See where you stand →See real results
What you get

Your brand's AI presence, in one place.

From your first scan to the weekly board report — one workflow, built so your team can act fast and your leadership can see the proof.

Every brief, every fix description, every agent decision is calibrated to your brand voice, your USPs, and your competitive positioning — not generic AI output.

SCAN RESULT · yourbrand.com · v4.2 · 2.1sCOMPLETE
Scanning yourbrand.com against the 7-pillar AEO framework
Entity Authority
82↑8pts
Technical
74↑3pts
On-site Content
68↓2pts
Structured Data
91↑12pts
E-E-A-T Signals
63— 0
Off-site Mentions
54↓5pts
Linked-data Graph
71↑4pts
Overall score: 72/100 · Grade B⚠ 3 pillars need immediate attention
Why We Are Different

Most AEO work is never measured. We measure ours.

Other tools tell you what's wrong and stop there. We take a citation baseline before each change, re-measure after, and report the difference per engine and per query with a confidence interval — including the changes that made no difference.

See the method on a real engagement →
Example verdict · shape of the output, not a client result
Perplexity · Post-fix verdict
Citation rate +11.3 percentage points — statistically significant
42.7% · 95% CI [38.9–46.6%] · p < 0.001
ChatGPT · Post-fix verdict
Citation rate +9.4 percentage points — statistically significant
52.1% · 95% CI [48.3–55.9%] · p < 0.001
Our Framework

Seven dimensions.
Three audit pillars.

We score seven dimensions of your AI presence, grouped into the three pillars the platform audits — Technical, Content, and Authority. Every fix is tied to one. Every report shows which ones moved.

01 · AUTHORITY
Entity Authority
Wikidata, Wikipedia, structured About pages. The substrate AI retrieves from.
02 · TECHNICAL
Technical Readiness
llms.txt, robots policy, JSON-LD schema, markup AI parsers actually understand.
03 · CONTENT
On-site Content
FAQ blocks, comparison tables, direct definitions. Built for machine extraction.
04 · TECHNICAL
Structured Data
Organization, Product, FAQ, HowTo. Validated and generated in one click.
05 · CONTENT
E-E-A-T Signals
Author entities, credentials, reviews. Proof AI uses to decide who to cite.
06 · AUTHORITY
Off-site Mentions
Media mentions, .edu/.gov citations, podcasts, expert roundups.
07 · AUTHORITY
Linked-data Footprint
Crunchbase, DBpedia, ProductHunt, industry directories. Be referenceable everywhere AI looks.
Services

Run it yourself, or
have us run it for you.

The platform is live and self-serve from $99/mo. Or take a managed retainer and our team operates it for you. Either way, every service connects back to the same measurement system — you always know what moved, by how much, and why.

The platform is live. Start from $99/mo.

Starter, Growth and Pro have transparent pricing and self-serve checkout. Managed retainers are conversation-led.

See pricing →Explore the platform
Real Results

Real numbers.
Real GSC exports.

Six engagements across media, health, D2C and wellness. Every result follows the same method — Audit, Act, Measure — and every metric came from a Search Console export, not a projection.

157M
clicks in a single 9-month engagement
News property · two-engine model
8.8×
click growth in 16 months from compound architecture
Health and wellness D2C
4.4%
CTR at average position 18 — 2 to 3× benchmark
D2C retail brand
73×
monthly impression growth in six months
Gut health brand
Digital Media · News
157M clicks
157 million clicks. The two-engine model that drives a news property at scale.
The spike was not a content win. It was an infrastructure win — four years of crawl architecture, entity schema, and Top Stories credentialing before it.
157M
Total Clicks
3.07B
Impressions
5.1%
Avg CTR
Nov 2023 – Jul 2024 · 9 moRead the full study →
Health and Wellness · D2C
8.8× growth
8.8× click growth in 16 months. Nine months of patience, then everything at once.
Compound architecture does not pay out linearly. Nine months of groundwork produced almost nothing visible, then the curve broke upward and stayed there.
8.8×
Click Growth
3.44M
Total Clicks
18.4→5.4
Avg Position
Oct 2023 – Jan 2025 · 16 moRead the full study →
Hair Care · D2C · Health
+258% clicks
258% click growth. Page 3 to page 1 in eight months.
135 Hindi URLs outpulled 553 English ones. Language-market fit beat content volume by a factor no keyword tool would have predicted.
+258%
Click Growth
+544%
Impressions
28.9→5.3
Avg Position
Apr 2025 – Nov 2025 · 8 moRead the full study →
Free audit · No account needed

Be the brand AI cites.

See in 60 seconds whether AI is recommending you or your competitors. Then we fix it — and prove it worked.

Free scan, no account · Platform live from $99/mo · Managed retainers available